Vietnam’s commitment to net-zero emissions by 2050 has placed its transport sector at the heart of a sweeping green transition. With road transport accounting for over 80% of the sector’s greenhouse gas emissions, electrifying public vehicles—especially buses—has become a national priority.
Yet beneath the surface of this ambitious shift lies a more complex story: one of uneven access, regional asymmetry, and the quiet reckoning of urban equity.
Join us as we take a closer look at Vietnam’s green vehicle adoption not as a technological inevitability, but as a test of governance, inclusion, and the geography of public benefit.
Vietnam’s Green Transition Program
Vietnam’s electrification roadmap is anchored in Decision 876/QD-TTg (2022), which mandates that by 2025, all new or replacement buses must run on electric or clean energy, with full conversion of taxis by 2030. By 2050, 100% of public transport vehicles are expected to be powered by green energy.
Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC) and Hanoi have emerged as focal points, with HCMC aiming to convert 1,800 buses by 2030—roughly 73% of its fleet. Hanoi, meanwhile, has earmarked VND 43 trillion for a 50/50 split between electric and CNG buses.
Yet implementation across Vietnam’s 63 provinces remains uneven. As of mid-2024, 28 provinces had not submitted detailed plans, and 9 requested delays due to infrastructure and financial constraints. The national ambition is clear, but the path is fragmented.
Urban Centres vs. Peripheral Regions
Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City: Leading but Lagging
Despite their leadership roles, Vietnam’s two largest cities face persistent structural gaps. The bus-to-population ratio in both Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City remains under 0.2%, far below the recommended benchmark of 0.8 buses per 1,000 residents. To meet projected demand, each city would require an additional 5,000–6,000 buses.
Recent expansions have added hundreds of electric buses across dozens of new routes, bringing Ho Chi Minh City’s total to over 600 electric buses—roughly 26% of its fleet. When combined with compressed natural gas (CNG) vehicles, nearly half of the city’s public transport fleet now operates on alternative fuels. Hanoi has also seen steady growth in electric bus deployment, though both cities continue to grapple with infrastructure limitations and uneven service coverage.
Peripheral Provinces: Stalled at the Starting Line
Outside major urban centers, the picture is starkly different. Smaller cities and rural provinces lack the infrastructure, financial models, and pilot programs needed to initiate electrification. Charging stations are scarce, and grid reliability remains a concern. Without targeted support, these regions risk being left behind in Vietnam’s green transition.
Commuter Experience: Who Benefits from Electrification?
Electric buses are not just cleaner—they’re more attractive. According to recent data, 89% of electric bus users are commuters, compared to just 25–30% for regular buses. These buses offer:
- Reliable service with GPS tracking and automated announcements
- Modern amenities like free Wi-Fi and contactless payment
- Affordable fares, often lower than diesel or CNG alternatives
- Inclusive policies, including free rides for children under 1.3m, disabled passengers, and veterans
Routes often connect suburban areas to urban job centers, making them especially appealing to workers facing long commutes. Yet this raises a critical question: are these benefits reaching low-income or marginalized communities, or are they reinforcing existing patterns of urban privilege?
Private Sector and Innovation
The electrification of Vietnam’s public transport has been propelled by private investment, which has played a catalytic—but also cautionary—role. Private operators have built charging infrastructure, expanded electric bus fleets, and secured large-scale contracts that have accelerated adoption. However, this concentration of control raises questions about long-term governance and public accountability.
New entrants continue to shape the market, supplying hundreds of electric buses to major cities and piloting routes in urban centers. Yet the sector remains heavily reliant on private capital and public-private partnerships, with limited diversification among operators.
Government incentives—such as low-interest loans covering up to 85% of capital costs, tax exemptions, and direct subsidies—have helped attract investment. Still, early financial losses in key cities underscore the risks of scaling without sustainable revenue models or broader public oversight.
Environmental Gains vs. Social Trade-offs
Vietnam’s electrification promises significant environmental benefits. Under high-intervention scenarios, HCMC alone could reduce emissions by 866,000 tons of CO? by 2030 and 11.9 million tons by 2050. Nationally, the transport sector could cut emissions by 88.9% compared to business-as-usual projections.
Yet these gains must be weighed against social trade-offs:
- Lifecycle emissions from battery production and disposal
- Energy equity, given the grid’s dependence on coal and frequent outages
- Access disparities, especially in regions without charging infrastructure or financial support
Electrification is not inherently equitable. Without deliberate planning, it risks deepening divides between urban and rural, rich and poor, connected and isolated.
Recommendations and Reflections
To ensure a just transition, Vietnam must:
- Synchronise national and provincial planning, with technical and financial support for lagging regions
- Expand charging infrastructure, especially in underserved areas
- Design inclusive routes, prioritizing low-income and marginalized communities
- Diversify operators, reducing reliance on single entities
- Ensure data transparency, with public reporting on ridership, emissions, and equity metrics
International partnerships, like those with the Asian Development Bank, can provide funding and technical expertise. But domestic governance and community engagement will determine whether electrification serves all—or only a few.
Vietnam’s Green Transit: Electrification as a Mirror
Vietnam’s green transit journey is more than a technological upgrade. It’s a mirror reflecting the country’s aspirations, contradictions, and unresolved tensions. Electrification offers cleaner air and quieter streets—but also reveals who gets to move, and who gets left behind.
To build a truly green future, Vietnam must look beyond the vehicles and toward the systems they serve. Because the road to net zero is not just about emissions—it’s about equity.
For more news and insights, stay tuned to the AIC website.